Trade & Sourcing PolicyTKT-AF38
Vietnam Reviews VAT Policy for Export Textile and Garment Firms
Vietnam's government is reviewing VAT policy for export-oriented textile and garment manufacturers, a cost variable for brands sourcing apparel from the country.
- Cut
- October 3, 2026
- Sew
- 1 min
- Ticket
- TKT-AF38
Construction
Vietnam's government has initiated a review of VAT policy covering export-oriented textile and garment industries
MUC Consulting reported the review; specific measures, rates and timeline have not been disclosed
Any change in VAT treatment would affect cost bases of tier-1 garment factories and tier-2 fabric mills serving export brands
Vietnam's government has launched a review of its value-added tax (VAT) policy as it applies to export-oriented textile and garment manufacturers, according to a report by MUC Consulting.
The review targets the VAT treatment of companies that produce textiles and garments predominantly for export markets, a segment that sits at the centre of Vietnam's role as one of the largest apparel sourcing destinations for brands shipping to the US and Europe.
Details of the specific measures under consideration remain limited. MUC Consulting's report, surfaced via Google News, did not specify which VAT refund mechanisms, rates or administrative procedures the review covers, nor did it give a timeline for a decision.
VAT policy is a material cost issue for exporters. Where input VAT on domestically purchased fabrics, trimmings and services cannot be offset against output VAT on export sales — which are typically zero-rated — manufacturers face cash-flow pressure that flows directly into quoted FOB prices for buyers.
Textile and garment manufacturing is a major foreign-exchange earner for Vietnam, and any change in VAT treatment of export production would affect the cost base of the tier-1 cut-and-sew factories and tier-2 fabric mills that supply international brands sourcing from the country.
Buyers with Vietnam-heavy sourcing books, and suppliers bidding on programmes priced under current tax assumptions, will need to track the review's outcome. A decision that tightens refund eligibility or slows refunds would raise effective landed costs; one that simplifies refunds would free working capital across the supply base.
The sourcing decision this news forces: cost-and-finance teams at brands and vendors with Vietnamese production should model both scenarios in their FOB negotiations now, rather than wait for the policy detail to land.
via Google News: Textile industry (Source)
More from Tom Whitfield
Show full bio
Staff writer covering consumer brands and retail at Softgoods Report.
88 articles