Trade & Sourcing PolicyTKT-8D3B
NCTO chief presses USTR for stronger textile industry backing
NCTO's CEO has asked the USTR for stronger backing for US textile makers, a move with direct cost implications for furniture and apparel input sourcing.
- Cut
- September 28, 2026
- Sew
- 2 min
- Ticket
- TKT-8D3B

Construction
NCTO CEO urged the Office of the US Trade Representative to provide stronger support for the US textile industry.
Furniture Today reported the appeal; no specific policy measures were disclosed in the report.
The request affects furniture and apparel buyers sourcing US-made upholstery fabrics and textile inputs.
The CEO of the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) has urged the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) to deliver stronger support for the US textile industry, Furniture Today reports.
The appeal places a specific demand before America's lead trade negotiator: the domestic textile supply chain, which spans fibre spinning, fabric formation, dyeing and finishing, and cut-and-sew operations supplying sectors from apparel to home furnishings, wants a firmer policy footing than it currently has.
The intervention matters for downstream buyers in furniture and furnishing supply chains. US textile mills supply upholstery fabrics, technical textiles and sewn components to furniture manufacturers, and any shift in how USTR treats the sector — through tariff structures, procurement rules or enforcement against import competition — will ripple into sourcing costs and supplier availability for those buyers.
Furniture Today reported the story; no further specifics of the NCTO CEO's requests, such as named policy measures, tariff lines or enforcement targets, were included in the report. The NCTO, the principal US trade association for the domestic textile industry, has repeatedly framed the sector's position around trade policy in past advocacy, but buyers should treat the details of this latest request as pending until USTR or NCTO publishes the full submission.
For sourcing teams, the question is which policy instruments USTR picks up in response. Options historically on the table for the sector include tariff enforcement against transshipment, stronger government purchasing preferences under Berry Amendment-type rules, and action against competitively priced imports. Each route carries a different cost and compliance consequence for importers and for manufacturers sourcing US-made textile inputs.
Procurement and compliance leads at furniture and apparel brands should track USTR's response, review exposure of their textile input sourcing to potential tariff or enforcement changes, and confirm which suppliers in their base depend on the policy stance NCTO is asking Washington to harden.
via Google News: Textile industry (Source)
More from James Calloway
Show full bio
Market editor covering industry trends and analytics at Softgoods Report.
94 articles