Garment Production TechnologyTKT-FE77

Inkjet printing gaining ground across textile production, Printweek reports

Printweek reports inkjet printing is taking a durable hold on textile production, with implications for order minimums, sampling speed and print supplier selection.

Cut
September 27, 2026
Sew
2 min
Ticket
TKT-FE77
Inkjet printing leaves a lasting impression on the textile industry - Printweek
Inkjet printing leaves a lasting impression on the textile industry - PrintweekAI-generated

Construction

  1. Printweek published an analysis titled "Inkjet printing leaves a lasting impression on the textile industry."

  2. The report frames inkjet as a lasting shift in textile production rather than a niche method.

  3. No named suppliers, order volumes, or capacity figures were available in the accessible material.

Printweek, the UK printing trade title, has published an analysis under the headline "Inkjet printing leaves a lasting impression on the textile industry," reporting that inkjet technology is establishing a durable position in textile manufacturing rather than serving as a niche decoration method.

The report positions inkjet as a technology with staying power in the sector. That framing matters for softgoods sourcing teams because printing method sits upstream of most fabric procurement decisions: a shift toward digital inkjet changes minimum order quantities, sampling turnaround, and the geography of viable print suppliers.

The Printweek piece did not, in the material available to this desk, name specific buyer-supplier commitments, machine orders, or capacity figures. Any figures on installed bases, throughput, or supplier wins circulating in its wake should be treated as unconfirmed until they trace back to the publication's full text or to named vendors and mills.

For sourcing directors, the significance of a trade-press assessment like this lies in what digital inkjet generally implies for order economics when a publication of record describes it as leaving a "lasting impression": short-run capability, reduced screen-setup costs, and faster design-to-fabric cycles. These attributes move printing decisions closer to on-demand models and affect how brands allocate print work across suppliers in Europe and Asia.

Buyers reading the report should separate two categories of claim. Confirmed technology adoption — mills announcing inkjet lines, vendors confirming installations — carries commercial weight. Broader statements about the direction of the textile industry are analytical judgment, in this case Printweek's own editorial assessment, and should be weighed accordingly.

The sourcing decision the news forces is procedural rather than urgent: procurement teams with print-dependent programmes should verify which of their suppliers run inkjet capacity, at what run lengths it becomes cost-competitive, and whether sampling lead times quoted on the back of digital capability are contractually committed or indicative. Where compliance files reference print chemistry, teams should confirm that inkjet ink sets meet the restricted-substance standards their markets require.

Softgoods Report will update this item if Printweek's full analysis contains named suppliers, volumes, or investment figures.

via Google News: Textile industry (Source)

Share this article:

More from Grace Kim

Grace Kim

Show full bio

Correspondent covering marketplaces and e-commerce at Softgoods Report.

100 articles